<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maurice Sherif Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>U.S.-Mexico Border Crossing Deaths Are A Humanitarian Crisis, According To Report From The ACLU And CNDH</title>
		<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/u-s-mexico-border-crossing-deaths-are-a-humanitarian-crisis-according-to-report-from-the-aclu-and-cndh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/u-s-mexico-border-crossing-deaths-are-a-humanitarian-crisis-according-to-report-from-the-aclu-and-cndh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 17:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The American Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrea Guerrero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Patrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossing Death Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanitarian Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javier Garcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Gatekeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South of Texas Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us and Mexican governments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN DIEGO – U.S., Mexican and international officials must recognize  the  deaths of migrants occurring during unauthorized crossings of the  U.S.-Mexican  border as an international humanitarian crisis and respond  with reforms that  make human life a priority, according to a new  report released today by the  American [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #800000;">SAN DIEGO –</span> U.S., Mexican and international officials must recognize  the  deaths of migrants occurring during unauthorized crossings of the  U.S.-Mexican  border as an international humanitarian crisis and respond  with reforms that  make human life a priority, according to a new  report released today by the  American Civil Liberties Union of San  Diego and Imperial Counties and Mexico&#8217;s  National Commission on Human  Rights (CNDH). The report, <em>Humanitarian Crisis:  Migrant Deaths at  the U.S.-Mexico Border</em>, finds that border deaths have  increased  despite fewer unauthorized crossings due to the economic downturn.</p>
<p>The release of the report marks the 15th anniversary of the border   enforcement policy Operation Gatekeeper that concentrated border agents  and  added walls and fencing along populated areas, intentionally  forcing migrants to  hostile environments and natural barriers that  increase the incidence of injury  and death.</p>
<p>&#8220;The current policies in place on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico  border have  created a humanitarian crisis that has led to the deaths of  more than 5,000  people,&#8221; said Kevin Keenan, Executive Director of the  ACLU of San Diego and  Imperial Counties. &#8220;Because of deadly practices  and policies like Operation  Gatekeeper, the death toll continues to  rise unabated despite the decrease in  unauthorized crossings due to  economic factors.</p>
<div id="attachment_526" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 570px"><a href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/L1010715.JPG"><img class="size-large wp-image-526" title="L1010715" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/L1010715-1024x768.jpg" alt="South of Texas" width="560" height="348" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">South of Texas</p></div>
<p>The report analyzes deadly border enforcement policies and practices  and  their impact on individuals, families and communities and offers  concrete  recommendations to significantly decrease and possibly end the  humanitarian  crisis at the border.</p>
<p>Some of the report&#8217;s major findings include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Border  deaths have increased despite the economic downturn,  fewer migrant crossers and  a steady drop in apprehensions.</li>
<li>In the last 15 years, the deaths occurring  during unauthorized  border crossings have been a predictable and inhumane  outcome of  border-security policies like Operation Gatekeeper.</li>
<li>Migrants&#8217;  risk of death during unauthorized crossings has  increased in spite of government  programs that attempt to reduce the  harmful effects of border enforcement  policies and strategies.</li>
<li>The ongoing deaths of migrants have exposed  government  incompliance with international law obligations in the treatment of  the  dead and their families.</li>
</ul>
<p>Since Operation Gatekeeper went into effect in 1994, an estimated  5,600  migrants have died while attempting unauthorized border  crossings. In response  to government failures to prevent migrant  deaths, many organizations have set up  water stations, desert medical  camps, humanitarian-aid patrols and other rescue  and recovery  operations in an attempt to save lives along the U.S.-Mexican  border  area. As the report details, these activities have been increasingly met   with government opposition and punishment.</p>
<p>&#8220;By any measure, Operation Gatekeeper is a failure. It didn&#8217;t reduce   unauthorized border crossings, the economy did. It has, however, cost  thousands  of people their lives,&#8221; said Andrea Guerrero, Field and  Policy Director of the  ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties.  &#8220;Instead of policies that foster  fatalities, we need sensible, humane  immigration and border policies that  prioritize human life over death.&#8221;</p>
<p>The report recommends actions that the U.S. and Mexican governments  should  take to protect and advance the human right to life of migrants,   including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Recognize border crossing deaths as an international  humanitarian  crisis.</li>
<li>Adopt sensible, humane immigration and border policies.</li>
<li>Shift more  U.S. Border Patrol resources to search and rescue.</li>
<li>Support nongovernmental  humanitarian efforts at the border.</li>
<li>Direct government agencies to allow  humanitarian organizations  to do their work to save lives and recover  remains.</li>
<li>Establish a binational, one-stop resource for rescue and  recovery  calls and convene all data collecting agencies to develop a  uniform  system.</li>
<li>Invite international involvement.</li>
</ul>
<p>Javier Garcia, whose testimony about his brother who died while  crossing the  border is featured in the report, said, &#8220;I hope that my  brother&#8217;s case is taken  as an example of what should not happen, that  things change.&#8221;</p>
<h5>The report can be found online at: <a href="http://www.aclu.org/immigrants/gen/41186pub20091001.html">www.aclu.org/immigrants/gen/41186pub20091001.html</a></h5>
<h5><span id="main" style="visibility: visible;"><span id="search" style="visibility: visible;"><em>Courtesy of ACLU 2010.<br />
</em></span></span></h5>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/u-s-mexico-border-crossing-deaths-are-a-humanitarian-crisis-according-to-report-from-the-aclu-and-cndh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The American Wall Sections in Roma, Rio Grande City 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/wall-sections-in-roma-rio-grande-city-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/wall-sections-in-roma-rio-grande-city-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[La Linea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Ebanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Grande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May 4 the GAO issued a report on SBInet, which included a statement that  DHS has allocated fiscal 2010 funds to build the 3 sections of wall in  Roma, Rio Grande City, and Los Ebanos which have been on hold for the  past 2 years because DHS could  not get approval [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_512" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 673px"><a title="South of Texas" href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/L1010665.JPG"><img class="size-large wp-image-512" style="border: 1px solid black; margin: 1px;" title="L1010665" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/L1010665-1024x768.jpg" alt="South of Texas" width="663" height="498" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">South of Texas</p></div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">May 4 the GAO issued a report on SBInet, which included a statement that  DHS has allocated fiscal 2010 funds to build the 3 sections of wall in  Roma, Rio Grande City, and Los Ebanos which have been on hold for the  past 2 years because DHS could  not get approval from IBWC.</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_512" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 673px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">South of Texas</dd>
</dl>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/wall-sections-in-roma-rio-grande-city-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>100-mile radius raises debate over Constitution, civil rights</title>
		<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/100-mile-radius-raises-debate-over-constitution-civil-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/100-mile-radius-raises-debate-over-constitution-civil-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 16:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[La Linea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100-mile radius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Patrol Interior Checkpoints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La Linea HR6061]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
WASHINGTON &#8212; Vince Peppard was  cruising up the highway toward San Diego, wife in the seat next to him  and a bunch of tile in tow.
The 53-year-old retired social  worker was driving north from Tecate, Mexico, on his way to fix up an  old house.
“I breezed right through the checkpoint,” Pepper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_498" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 639px"><a href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/GREENRIGHTS1022.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-498" title="GREENRIGHTS1022" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/GREENRIGHTS1022.jpg" alt="100-mile radius raises debate over Constitution, civil rights" width="629" height="472" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">100-mile radius raises debate over Constitution, civil rights</p></div>
<div>
<p>WASHINGTON &#8212; Vince Peppard was  cruising up the highway toward San Diego, wife in the seat next to him  and a bunch of tile in tow.</p>
<p>The 53-year-old retired social  worker was driving north from Tecate, Mexico, on his way to fix up an  old house.</p>
<p>“I breezed right through the checkpoint,” Pepper  recalled. “Then a half-hour later, when I got into the U.S., they were  opening my trunk and searching my car. I didn’t feel like I was in the  United States. I felt like I was in some police state.”</p>
<p>Peppard  was stopped about 20 miles north of the Mexican border by customs  officials who demanded to search his car, he said. When he refused,  Peppard said, a customs official brought in search dogs, hassled his  wife &#8212; who is from Syria &#8212; for her citizenship papers and detained him  for more than 30 minutes.</p>
<p>He was ultimately let go. But he  can’t let go of the fact that he was stopped inside the United States.</p>
<p>“I  actually feel nervous that I’m going to be pulled over,” Peppard said  via a video hookup at a news conference Wednesday. “Now I have to have  my passport when I go to the Home Depot or something.”</p>
<p>It was  stories like Peppard’s that prompted a civil rights group to challenge  the constitutionality of practices carried out by the U.S. Customs and  Border Protection.</p>
<p>The American Civil Liberties Union charged  Wednesday that searches by customs agents within 100 miles of the U.S.  border threatens the rights of millions of Americans.</p>
<p>The civil  rights group released a map showing that nearly two-thirds of Americans –  194.7 million people &#8212; live within a 100-mile-radius of the U.S.  borders and could be subject to an infringement of their Fourth  Amendment protection against unreasonable searches.</p>
<p>“This is an  area where the government is attempting to turn into a Constitution-free  zone,” said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU’s Washington  Legislative Office. “The federal government has been allowed to turn  areas of this nation into places where anyone can be stopped and  searched for any reason &#8212; or no reason at all.</p>
<p>“It is a classic  case example of law enforcement powers expanding far beyond the proper  boundaries&#8211;in this case literally.”</p>
<p>The group said it will push  for legislation in the next administration to curtail customs  officials’ search authority.</p>
<p>Customs and Border Protection, which  falls under the Department of Homeland Security, was authorized by  Congress nearly 50 years ago to operate within a “reasonable distance”  inside the border, which it designates as a 100-mile radius. The agency  operates 33 checkpoints, and the ACLU said complaints about the  checkpoints have risen since Sept.11.</p>
<p>But border patrol  officials say that the checkpoints are anything but unconstitutional.</p>
<p>“The  100-mile zone absolutely is not a Constitution-free zone,” said Jason  Ciliberti, a supervisory border patrol agent with the U.S. Customs and  Border Protection. “Those 100 miles are what essentially is said to be a  reasonable distance from the boundary from the United States, and the  Supreme Court has come down firmly on our side and said that what we’re  doing is not unreasonable.”</p>
<p>Ciliberti said that the department is  sensitive to citizen complaints about checkpoints and has tried to  smooth the process.</p>
<p>“The vast number of those encounters is very  brief,” Ciliberti said. “If [necessary], agents do take some time to  conduct investigations. But, of course, they conduct those  investigations with due diligence and as minimally invasive as  possible.”</p>
<p>“In order to arrest that person, we still need  probable cause as anywhere in the United States,” he added.</p>
<p>But,  he noted, the agency will continue its searches as part of its efforts  to stop drug smugglers and illegal immigrants.</p>
<p>“We do have a job  to do and we don’t have the opportunity to be wrong &#8212; even once,”  Ciliberti said. “So, we understand if people are offended by our  tactics. We take the Constitution very seriously, we take it to heart.”</p>
<h5><em>by </em> <a title="Erica L. Green" href="http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&amp;ItemID=67323">Erica  L. Green</a></h5>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/100-mile-radius-raises-debate-over-constitution-civil-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona-Sonora  Recovered Human Remains</title>
		<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/arizona-sonora-recovered-human-remains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/arizona-sonora-recovered-human-remains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 16:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[La Linea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona-Sonora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalción de Derechos Humanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Remains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Mexico Border]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fiscal Year (October 1- September 30) 
2000-2001            136
2001-2002            163
2002-2003            205
2003-2004            234
2004-2005            282
2005-2006            205
2006- 2007           237
2007- 2008           183
2008-2009            206
October 1, 2009 &#8211; February 28, 2010      110
Total Human Remains = 1,961
 
 
This Year&#8217;s Deaths
&#8220;Coalción de Derechos Humanos&#8221; counts the number of bodies recovered in Arizona for the fiscal year, which begins October 1st and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>Fiscal Year (October 1- September 30) </strong></span></h4>
<p>2000-2001            <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>136</strong></span></p>
<p>2001-2002            <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>163</strong></span></p>
<p>2002-2003            <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>205</strong></span></p>
<p>2003-2004            <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>234</strong></span></p>
<p>2004-2005            <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">282</span></strong></p>
<p>2005-2006            <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>205</strong></span></p>
<p>2006- 2007           <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>237</strong></span></p>
<p>2007- 2008           <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">183</span></strong></p>
<p>2008-2009           <strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> 206</span></strong></p>
<p>October 1, 2009 &#8211; February 28, 2010      <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>110</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Total Human Remains</strong><strong> = </strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>1,961</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_495" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 555px"><a href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Road_Cross_04.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-495  " title=" " src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Road_Cross_04.jpg" alt="Road_Cross_04" width="545" height="554" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text"> </p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> </strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h3><strong>This Year&#8217;s Deaths</strong></h3>
<p>&#8220;Coalción de Derechos Humanos&#8221; counts the number of bodies recovered in Arizona for the fiscal year, which begins October 1st and ends September 30th of every year. This will be so that we can compare the numbers put out by the government officials with those that we gather, in collaboration with the Consular offices and county medical examiners.</p>
<h6><em>Data courtesy of </em>(®).<em>Coalción de Derechos Humanos</em></h6>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/arizona-sonora-recovered-human-remains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.S. government said it plans to build 70 miles of 16-foot-tall (5 meter) Wall in southern Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/the-u-s-government-said-it-plans-to-build-70-miles-of-16-foot-tall-5-meter-border-fencig-in-southern-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/the-u-s-government-said-it-plans-to-build-70-miles-of-16-foot-tall-5-meter-border-fencig-in-southern-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[La Linea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brownsville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South of Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wild Refuge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The plans were unveiled in the  first  detailed look at the Wall the government says it must build  to slow illegal immigration along the 1,200-mile-long  (1,920-km) Texas-Mexico border. In  a request for public comment on the environmental impact  of the  Wall, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="articleText">The plans were unveiled in the  first  detailed look at the Wall the government says it must build  to slow illegal immigration along the 1,200-mile-long  (1,920-km) Texas-Mexico border. </span>In  a request for public comment on the environmental impact  of the  Wall, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency  said construction  could begin next spring</p>
<div id="attachment_510" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 697px"><a href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/L1010645.JPG"><img class="size-large wp-image-510" title="L1010645" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/L1010645-1024x577.jpg" alt="South of Texas" width="687" height="387" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">South of Texas</p></div>
<p>The fence, to be built in 21 segments at strategic points  along the Rio Grande, must be able to withstand a crash by a  10,000-pound (4,545-kg) vehicle traveling at 40 miles per hour  (64 kph), but also be &#8220;aesthetically pleasing,&#8221; the agency  said.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p><span id="articleText">The wall is part of a federal plan to build  700 miles of  fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border.</span></p>
<p>The border protection agency said the wall would mostly be  built on river levees, but also would cross private land and  encroach on state parks and the Lower Rio Grande Valley  National Wildlife Refuge.</p>
<p>The  refuge is considered one of the most biologically  diverse wildlife sanctuaries in the nation and  environmentalists say the fence could harm endangered species  such as ocelots and jaguarundi found there.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="articleText">Many local leaders in southern Texas, which is  heavily  Hispanic and has strong economic and cultural ties to Mexico,  have criticized the border wall as unnecessary and an affront  to Mexicans.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/the-u-s-government-said-it-plans-to-build-70-miles-of-16-foot-tall-5-meter-border-fencig-in-southern-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the American Wall the last product of heroic modernism</title>
		<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/is-us-mexico-wall-the-last-product-of-heroic-modernism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/is-us-mexico-wall-the-last-product-of-heroic-modernism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[La Linea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brownsville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South of Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US - Mexico Wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently $2.4 billion has been spent since 2006 on a still-unfinished project to erect more than 613 miles (4 Million dollars a mile). $6.5 billion will be needed to maintain the new Wall over the next 20 years.
Still, the architects of the US &#8211; Mexico Wall hope it would change society. The result are towns [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently $2.4 billion has been spent since 2006 on a still-unfinished project to erect more than 613 miles (4 Million dollars a mile). $6.5 billion will be needed to maintain the new Wall over the next 20 years.</p>
<p>Still, the architects of the US &#8211; Mexico Wall hope it would change society. The result are towns divided in two without regard for prior form or use.</p>
<div id="attachment_431" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 583px"><a href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Texas-Border-Fence-Map-II1.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-431 " title="Texas Border Fence Map II" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Texas-Border-Fence-Map-II1-1024x507.jpg" alt="Texas Border Fence Map II" width="573" height="284" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Texas Border Fence Map II</p></div>
<p>Over time, the Wall evolved from fences to concrete <em>&#8220;jersey walls&#8221; </em>with steel mesh in South of Texas. The final form would be a Wall, constructed from 15 to 20 feet high, separated by a no-man’s-land as wide as 1 mile .  The Wall is capped by a smooth pipe, making it difficult to scale and is accompanied by trenches as well as &#8220;Normandy&#8221; vehicle fence consisting of steel beams fencing set in concrete. Also, tower-based integrated cameras and sensors, ground-based radar and mobile surveillance systems.</p>
<div id="attachment_439" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 440px"><a title="Border Life" rel="mauricesherif.com" href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/La-Linea_01.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="size-large wp-image-439  " title="Border Life &quot;La Linea&quot;" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/La-Linea_01-1024x1015.jpg" alt="La Linea_01" width="430" height="427" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Border Life &quot;La Linea&quot;</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p>It may succeed in changing society, but as with most modernist products, not in the way its builders intended. By providing a datum line for the US, the Wall gave meaning to the lives of its inhabitants. As the Wall was being constructed , situationists in the US and elsewhere are advocating for radical changes in cities as a means of preserving urban life.</p>
<p>In his 1972 thesis at the Architectural Association, entitled “Exodus, or the Voluntary Prisoners of Architecture,” <em>Rem Koolhaas</em> found a way of reconciling modernism with Situationism through the figure of the Berlin Wall. Suggesting that the Wall might be exported to London and made to encircle it, <em>Koolhaas</em> writes, “The inhabitants of this architecture, those strong enough to love it, would become its Voluntary Prisoners, ecstatic in the freedom of their architectural confines.” Inside, life would be “a continuous state of ornamental frenzy and decorative delirium, an overdose of symbols.” Although officially proposing a way of making London more interesting, Koolhaas’s thesis is really a set of observations about the already existing condition of the real Wall. In choosing to encircle London with the Wall, <em>Koolhaas </em>recognized that it was not only the last great product of modernism, it was the last work of heavy architecture. Already in 1966, in his introduction to 40 Under 40, Robert Stern observed that an increasingly dematerialized “cardboard architecture”  was “the order of the day”  in the United States while in England, architects such as <em>Archigram</em> were proposing barrier-less technological utopias.</p>
<div id="attachment_447" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 584px"><a href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Palomas-0062.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-447 " title="Palomas - Arizona" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Palomas-0062-1024x273.jpg" alt="Palomas 006" width="574" height="153" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Palomas - Arizona</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p>Built of concrete and steel, the US &#8211; Mexico wall is solid, weighty. It hearkened back to the days of the medieval city walls, which were not only defensive but attempted to organize and contain a world progressively more interconnected through communications and trade.</p>
<p>Walls acts as concentrators, defining places in which early capitalism and urbanity could be found and intensifying both. So long as the modes of communication remained physical and the methods of making and trading goods were slow, nations retained their authority and autonomy through architectural solidity.</p>
<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --></p>
<p style="text-indent: 0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/is-us-mexico-wall-the-last-product-of-heroic-modernism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The American Wall 1,200 miles (1,920 Km) in Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/1200-miles-1920-km-texas-mexico-broder-wall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/1200-miles-1920-km-texas-mexico-broder-wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[La Linea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Rio Grande River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas-Mexico Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US - Mexico Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIlde Refuge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Wall, to be built in 21 segments at strategic points along the Rio Grande, must be able to withstand a crash by a 10,000-pound (4,545-kg) vehicle traveling at 40 miles per hour (64 kph), but also be &#8220;aesthetically pleasing,&#8221; the agency said.
The wall is part of a federal plan to build 700 miles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Wall, to be built in 21 segments at strategic points along the Rio Grande, must be able to withstand a crash by a 10,000-pound (4,545-kg) vehicle traveling at 40 miles per hour (64 kph), but also be &#8220;aesthetically pleasing,&#8221; the agency said.</p>
<p>The wall is part of a federal plan to build 700 miles of walling along the U.S.-Mexico border.</p>
<div id="attachment_413" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 584px"><a href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/L10106501.JPG"><img class="size-large wp-image-413 " title="South Texas Border Wall 2010" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/L10106501-1024x577.jpg" alt="South Texas Border Wall 2010" width="574" height="323" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">South Texas Border Wall 2010</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p>The <span id="articleText">U.S. Customs and Border Protection</span> agency said the wall would mostly be built on river levees, but also would cross private land and encroach on state parks and the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge. The refuge is considered one of the most biologically diverse wildlife sanctuaries in the nation and environmentalists say the fence could harm endangered species such as ocelots and jaguarundi found there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/1200-miles-1920-km-texas-mexico-broder-wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Texas Border American Security Wall</title>
		<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/south-texas-border-wall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/south-texas-border-wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[La Linea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border patrol fence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brownsville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loop Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Landowners in south Texas are fighting plans by the federal government to build a Security Wall along the U.S.-Mexico border from Brownsville to Del Rio. The property owners in the Rio Grande Valley have refused to let U.S. surveyors onto their land. The government is suing to gain access, which it says it needs to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Landowners in south Texas are fighting plans by the federal government to build a Security Wall along the U.S.-Mexico border from Brownsville to Del Rio. The property owners in the Rio Grande Valley have refused to let U.S. surveyors onto their land. The government is suing to gain access, which it says it needs to complete nearly 370 miles of border fencing by the end of the year 2009.</p>
<div id="attachment_406" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 584px"><a href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/L10107012.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-406 " title="South Texas Border Wall 2010" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/L10107012-1024x639.jpg" alt="L1010701" width="574" height="358" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">South Texas Border Wall 2010</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p>The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s removal of more than 70 grapefruit trees from loop family land. On Wednesday morning, members of the Loop family watched helplessly as a government contractor’s large yellow Caterpillar excavator began the process of removing the trees. The trees were removed to make way for the border wall, which is being built by the Kiewit Corporation.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/south-texas-border-wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problems continue for virtual American Wall</title>
		<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/problems-continue-for-virtual-u-s-mexico-border-fence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/problems-continue-for-virtual-u-s-mexico-border-fence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[La Linea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Published 5 November 2009 by DHS
With most of the 661-mile border fence complete, DHS is gearing up for testing a section of the fence near Tuscon; if the system survives this first round, it will be handed off to the Border Patrol in early 2010, who will put the technology through some real world [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #993300;"> Published 5 November 2009 by DHS</span></p>
<p>With most of the 661-mile border fence complete, DHS is gearing up for testing a section of the fence near Tuscon; if the system survives this first round, it will be handed off to the Border Patrol in early 2010, who will put the technology through some real world scenarios.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/La-Linea_01.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-389" title="La Linea_01" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/La-Linea_01-300x300.jpg" alt="La Linea_01" width="300" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>DHS will this month conduct a crucial test that could determine the future of the U.S.-Mexico border fence project. With most of the 661-mile border fence complete, DHS is gearing up for the next step to secure the border: it is another “fence” — a virtual fence — armed with high-tech cameras, radars and sensors. This two-fence system is called the Secure Border Initiative, or SBI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/problems-continue-for-virtual-u-s-mexico-border-fence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Should Investigate U.S.-Mexico Border Crossing Deaths</title>
		<link>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/inter-american-commission-on-human-rights-should-investigate-u-s-mexico-border-crossing-deaths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/inter-american-commission-on-human-rights-should-investigate-u-s-mexico-border-crossing-deaths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[La Linea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR 6061]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maurice Sherif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican Human Rights Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican Human Rights Group Petition Commission:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More than 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ongoing violations of the right to life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego and Imperial Counties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US - Mexico Wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ACLU, Mexican Human Rights Group Petition Commission: Act to End Deadly Policies SDGLN.com Staff &#124; Fri, 11/13/2009 &#8211; 9:16pm &#124; Login to Like articles   (SAN DIEGO)  –
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of San Diego and Imperial Counties is calling on U.S., Mexican and international officials to recognize the alarming number of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="color: #ff6600;">ACLU, Mexican Human Rights Group Petition Commission: Act to End Deadly Policies SDGLN.com Staff | Fri, 11/13/2009 &#8211; 9:16pm | Login to Like articles   (SAN DIEGO)  –</span></strong></p>
<p>The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of San Diego and Imperial Counties is calling on U.S., Mexican and international officials to recognize the alarming number of migrant deaths at the U.S. &#8211; Mexico border as an international humanitarian crisis; address the ongoing violations of the right to life and identify protective measures going forward.</p>
<p>The ACLU joined together with Mexico&#8217;s National Commission on Human Rights (Comision Nacional de Derechos Humanos &#8211; CNDH) and sent a letter to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) &#8211; a commission of the Organization of American States (OAS). In the letter, they requested that the IACHR get permission from the U.S. and Mexican governments to make an onsite visit to the region. They further requested that once there, the IACHR conduct an investigation on the crisis, issue a report for the General Assembly of the OAS, and identify measures that both countries should adopt to bring them in compliance with their international human rights obligations.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/La-Linea-_008-2007.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-383" title="La Linea" src="http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/La-Linea-_008-2007.jpg" alt="La Linea" width="453" height="557" /></a></p>
<p>For emphasis, the ACLU and CNDH also provided the commission with the 76 page white paper they drafted documenting the situation: Humanitarian Crisis: Migrant Deaths at the U.S.-Mexico Border. The release of this report marked the 15th anniversary of the border enforcement policy, Operation Gatekeeper. This policy not only provided a higher concentration of border agents, but added walls and fencing along populated areas, forcing migrants into hostile environments and creating natural barriers that increased the incidence of injury and death. Since the program’s inception, an average of one migrant per day has died.</p>
<p>“More than 5,000 people have died crossing our border, and an estimated seven to eleven percent of them are children,” said Kevin Keenan, Executive Director of the ACLU of San Diego &amp; Imperial Counties. “Equally alarming are the hundreds of family members who are left in inconsolable limbo, never knowing the fate of their loved one.”</p>
<p>According to their report, family members have no alternative recourse, and are often faced with complex or contradictory methods and red-tape when merely trying to locate a loved one who may be missing or even dead. State obligations to these families with regards to migrant deaths at the border has never been addressed. There is no uniform standard or centralized data base for locating the migrants or identifying their remains. One-quarter of those who perish in transit are never identified, leaving their families behind in a permanent state of anguish.</p>
<p>Ten years ago, the San Diego ACLU submitted a petition to the IACHR alleging that U.S. border enforcement-deterrence strategies under Operation Gatekeeper violated the right to life under Article 1 of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man. The Commission initially expressed concern over the findings, even agreeing to monitor the situation, but eventually dismissed the petition and things have only gotten worse.</p>
<p>“Since the Commission consented to monitor the border situation, we respectfully ask that they now act on their concerns,” said Jose Luis Soberanes, president of CNDH. “When they initially expressed unease, only 300 migrants had died. Today, nearly twenty times that number have died—many of their deaths directly attributable to U.S. border enforcement policies.”</p>
<p>The local ACLU hopes that since the United States and Mexico are bound by the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, they will soon begin to adopt policies or negotiate bilateral agreements to deal with the crisis. Their recent white paper on the situation only highlights the fact that to date, the two countries have seemingly abandoned their obligations under international law to respect and ensure the rights of migrant populations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mauricesherif.com/blog/index.php/inter-american-commission-on-human-rights-should-investigate-u-s-mexico-border-crossing-deaths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
