Posts Tagged ‘Border Fence’

Border crossers finding new fence painful

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

NOGALES, AZ – The higher the wall, the harder they will fall. That’s what border crossers trying to scale the new border fence at Nogales are painfully finding out.

The imposing new border fence running through Nogales is proving to be a treacherous obstacle for suspected illegal immigrants.

Nogales 2011_v2

(New Wall 20 feet 6 inches 2011 – Old Wall 15 feet 2010)

A Nogales Police Department report says on Aug. 12, a woman broke her leg after climbing the border fence.

Two days later, officers found a second injured fence climber. And a third, suspected illegal immigrant from China fell and broke his leg on Aug 22.

Nogales Fire Department Chief Hector Robles tells the Nogales International that in addition to the height of the fence, adrenaline and miscalculations in determining the distance and angle of a fall ar potential injury factors.

By: Associated Press

photography – Maurice Sherif

New Border Fences Cut Off Access To Border Monuments

Wednesday, February 1st, 2012

SAN DIEGO — Before there was a fence, all that marked the border between Mexico and the United States were stone and steel monuments, 276 of them dotting the southwestern landscape. They were installed by Mexican and American surveyors starting in 1850, after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the Mexican-American War and the two countries agreed to define their shared border.

But as the U.S. Border Patrol has reinforced the boundary with a new fence, many of these bi-national monuments have been left entirely on the Mexican side of the barriers.Arizona_02_Pima County_LD

On the scenic stretch of coast where San Diego meets Tijuana, Mexico, the Border Patrol is making the border fence taller and thicker – impenetrable, it hopes, to drug smugglers and illegal crossers.

But peering through the new vertical bars and double mesh on a recent day, you could still make out a marble, pyramid-shaped monument on the other side.

It marks the precise point where Mexico and the U.S. meet, and visitors on opposite sides of the border were once able to approach the monument from both sides and talk through the fence.

But late last year, the Border Patrol moved its fence three feet to the north, fencing the monument out.

This has been happening at monument sites across the Southwest. It began when border fencing started going up in the early 1990s and has continued since 2006, when Congress approved the construction of 700 miles of new fence.

In 2008, the Border Patrol signed an accord with the agency responsible for maintaining the monuments – the International Boundary and Water Commission – agreeing not to disturb the monuments during fence construction.

So, in many places along the border, like San Diego, the Border Patrol built the fence a few feet north of the actual international boundary.

“The fence itself is constructed inside the United States,” said Jerry Conlin, a Border Patrol spokesman. The agreement between the two agencies, he said: “is that any type of construction around a monument would be set back three feet.”

Sally Spener is a spokeswoman for the boundary and water commission, which reviews the Border Patrol’s plans to ensure the fence is not inadvertently built on Mexican territory. She said commission officials had been willing to work with the Border Patrol to maintain access to the monument in San Diego.

She would not say whether the agency responded, but in any case, bi-national access was eliminated.

Now San Diego activists are hoping to convince the Border Patrol to change its fence design to restore access to the monument from both sides.

“A border monument needs to be on the border, not just on one side or the other. It’s a shared marker between two nations,” said Jim Brown, a local architect and activist. “To have the fence jog around and have it be almost ownership by Mexico doesn’t make any emotional sense, it makes no physical sense, it makes no common sense.”

Brown is a member of the Friends of Friendship Park, a group of activists that takes its name after the area where loved ones used to chat through the border fence until access was blocked.

Brown said he’s come up with a relatively simple design change that would make the monument accessible from both sides again.

Conlin said the Border Patrol was willing to listen, but stressed that border security was the agency’s mandate and priority.

David Taylor, an art professor at New Mexico State University in Las Cruces, has been photographing all 276 monuments since he realized the new fencing was going to make many of them inaccessible from the U.S.

He believes the monuments, once a symbol of bi-national cooperation, have become casualties of the push for greater border enforcement.

“It’s one of those very unfortunate situations where this thing that’s part of our shared heritage with Mexico isn’t easily accessible.”

On the other side, visitors have expressed their thoughts too.

An engraving on the monument warns vandals that defacing it is a crime punishable by Mexico or the United States. But someone recently used purple ink to cross out the words, United States.

Fronteras
January 28, 2012
By Adrian Florido

Military engineers dig in to support Border Patrol

Tuesday, January 24th, 2012

On Jan. 6, members of an Alaska-based Army airborne engineer brigade parachuted out of an Air Force plane at Fort Huachuca. Since then, they’ve been working to cut 0.7 miles of border access road through rugged terrain approximately 3 miles west of the Mariposa Port of Entry in Nogales.

Project organizers say the experience, from the parachute drop-in to the remote road-building and eventual departure on Feb. 27, mirrors the type of mission the 40 soldiers might conduct if they were deployed to a place like Afghanistan.4f1ecea5436c7.image

“This will prepare them for future deployments, especially in the areas of current contingency operations,” said Armando Carrasco, spokesman for the Department of Defense’s Joint Task Force North (JTF North), the agency that coordinated the mission.

Standing on a hilltop above the work site Friday as heavy machinery dug through a steep slope below her, mission commander Lt. Michelle Zak spoke of the difficulties of maneuvering large earth movers around the mountains, canyons and ravines of western Santa Cruz County.

“It’s been challenging, but also a great opportunity for us to train,” she said.

This effort, along with other military road-building projects that have been conducted in the county in recent years, also provides a great opportunity for agents at the U.S. Border Patrol’s Nogales Station to gain better access to some of their hardest-to-control areas.

“You’ve got to look at it as a win-win situation,” said Agent Steven Passement, a spokesman for the Border Patrol’s Tucson Sector.

“One, for the unit that’s here and the units that will come, it’s real-world training experience,” he said. “And for us, we’re getting infrastructure put in place that’s going to be permanent.”

Those permanent roads, built with drainage culverts to keep them from washing out, helps agents responds faster to illegal activity in the area and provide aid more quickly to migrants in distress. What’s more, Passement said, a better road surface means less wear-and-tear on Border Patrol vehicles, and therefore less expenditures on new tires, shock absorbers and struts.

Local residents and businesses are also benefiting from the arrangement. The current group of 40 engineers is staying at a local hotel and spending some of their pocket money at local establishments.

“I know a lot of the soldiers have been out on the town, and they’ve enjoyed the tacos that come from the trucks,” Zak said.

Rancher Dan Bell, who grazes cattle in the same section of Coronado National Forest lands where the road are being built, says he’s seen an improvement in security in the area since the road-building began.

“Prior to these roads going in, there really wasn’t any way to get to the border in a lot of these areas,” Bell said. “It’s allowed (Border Patrol) to actually get down to the border and patrol the actual border rather than a larger area that they’d have to hike or go into on horseback.”

The soldiers themselves are not engaged in any law enforcement activity while on the road-building projects, Carrasco said. That duty is left up to the Border Patrol.

Environmental concerns

Since the construction is taking place on National Forest land, the U.S. Forest Service has been included in the project planning, and an environmental monitor is on hand to make sure the project stays within the construction easement, said Maj. Chris Neels, mission planner for JTF North.

Even so, environmentalists like Jenny Neeley, conservation policy director at the Tucson-based Sky Island Alliance, say they are worried about the long-term effects of border-infrastructure projects that are conducted outside of federal environmental law. Since April 2008, the Department of Homeland Security has operated under a waiver that allows it to build border fencing and related infrastructure in the U.S. Southwest without having to adhere to more than 30 environmental regulations.

“We’re extremely disappointed that none of it is subject to review under the National Environmental Policy Act because of the existing waiver along the border,” Neeley said. “Those roads are being installed without any oversight whatsoever, in terms of regulatory oversight or having to follow best practices.”

Neeley said she hadn’t seen the particular roads being built west of Nogales, but she said there have been numerous projects carried out under the waiver that have later led to erosion and flooding. She cited an example from the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, where rainwater runoff collapsed a 40-foot stretch of new border fence in August 2010 due to faulty design.

A Department of Homeland Security-sponsored public forum in December 2010 laid out the technical details and environmental analysis that had gone into the planning of the agency’s border road and fence projects in and around Nogales. Still, Greg Gephart, program manager for tactical infrastructure for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acknowledged that the projects would be conducted under the environmental waiver.4f1ecef54d05a.image_II

“The waiver doesn’t mean we’re throwing out all environmental considerations,” Gephart said at the time. “It’s just a method that allows us to expedite the construction.”

‘Good feeling’

The 40 Army engineers currently deployed to Nogales work six days a week, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Even so, due to the terrain, theirs is the first of three phases necessary to complete the 0.7 miles of roadway.

What’s more, military units are scheduled to execute four additional engineering missions in the Nogales area in support of the Border Patrol during the current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30.

It’s all organized by JTF North, based at Fort Bliss, Texas, which has been supporting federal law enforcement agencies along the Southwest border since 1989. Working as a liaison between law enforcement and all four branches of the military, JTF North has coordinated engineering missions that built and improved roads and installed border lighting, fencing and vehicle barriers in areas stretching from California to Texas.

The majority of the costs of the projects are paid for with Department of Defense counter-drug funds, JTF North says; the participating law enforcement agency covers only the cost of materials.

For example, Tucson-based Hertz Equipment Rental has been contracted to provide the heavy machinery for the current road effort, as well as training and maintenance. That’s all covered by JTF North, Carrasco said.

As for the price tag for the 0.7-mile road project, Carrasco estimated $400,000 for Phases 1 and 2 and $350,000 for Phase 3 – a grand total of $1.15 million.

Part of the expense includes the cost of housing the soldiers at an area hotel, which is also contracted to provide the team with a hot breakfast and dinner each day. (JTF North declined to name the hotel, citing security concerns.)

“It also creates a good quality of life for them while they’re deployed on this mission,” he said. “Obviously they work very hard, so it’s important that we also take care of them during their down time.”

As for the military engineers, they say they are greatly appreciative of the good meals and soft beds – as well as the warm, sunny weather of Southern Arizona. After all, they left their home base in the middle of the frigid, snowy and daylight-deprived Alaska winter.

Specialist Nickalous Herd, a native of Atlanta, praised the “wonderful weather, wonderful people and wonderful state” as he stood at the worksite Friday under clear blue skies and 70-degree temperatures. And while the local terrain has been a challenge to work with, Herd said, he has also enjoyed its rugged beauty.

“It is beautiful, it is extremely beautiful here,” he said.

Sgt. Everell Gustave, a native of the Boston area, said the experience of coming to a new area and working under new conditions with new equipment has been an important skill-builder for his team, which, if deployed to Afghanistan, might parachute into a remote area to rebuild roads, supply routes and airstrips.

“It is definitely a good feeling for our guys. We are getting the training that we need to be successful anywhere around the world,” Gustave said. “Helping out the Border Patrol is just a plus.”

By Jonathan Clark Nogales International

copyright © Nogales International

Images By Jonathan Clark

Nogales International
Phone number: (520) 375-5760
Address: 268 W. View Point Dr.
Nogales, AZ 85621

Ag Commissioner Declares War on the Border

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

Lately it seems that Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples would rather have the Texas Department of Agriculture become a wing of the U.S. Department of Defense than a Texas state agency. Not long ago, Staples commissioned an $80,000 “strategic military assessment” of the Texas border. The Ag Commissioner released the 182-page tome, written by two retired generals, yesterday in a press conference at the Texas Capitol. Texas_Plate_26

If you hadn’t heard, Staples is running for Lieutenant Governor in 2014. For the past year, the Ag Commissioner has been beating the war drums and burnishing his border security credentials. Last March, he unveiled a fancy, new taxpayer-funded Web site called “Protect Your Texas Border” which offers such highlights as night-vision surveillance chases of drug traffickers along the Rio Grande and a video interview with a Texas Ranger who proclaims: “We are in a war and I am not going to sugarcoat it by any means. We are in a war, and it is what it is.”

The Web site also hosts a forum where visitors are encouraged to share their views on securing the border. The forum was dinged by the press, however, after a number of posts advocated for vigilante justice offering such gems of advice as “Killem all!!!! They are destroying or great country.”

Now, we have Staples’ “military assessment” advocating for greater militarization of the border, which sets a dangerous precedent and adds to the growing campaign by the GOP to turn Mexico into Afghanistan. In the report written by retired Generals Barry McCaffery and Robert Scales drug cartel operatives are referred to as “narco-terrorists” and U.S. border counties are referred to as the “sanitary tactical zone” where military operations can push back the “narco-terrorists.” The generals applaud the Texas Department of Public Safety’s “comprehensive military-like operational campaign against narco-terrorists” and suggest that Texas serve as the national model for the nation-wide militarization of the border.

“Five years of state operations have yielded valuable lessons and insights that can improve the border security operations of states and U.S. federal agencies. Below are insights shared by senior leaders within the Texas DPS who consider their operations in the war against narco-terrorism to be a model for how war might be prosecuted in a wider, multi-state and national campaign. They accede to the face that much of their effort was derived from experience in recent campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan…”Texas_Plate_6

The only problem is this isn’t a war and U.S. border counties — last I checked — are still considered part of the United States and civilian territory. They also boast crime and murder rates far lower than cities such as Washington, D.C., according to FBI crime statistics.

Despite this fact, GOP leaders are pushing ahead at both the federal and state level to turn the border region into a theater of war. After 9/11, Congress gave the Department of Homeland Security the right to set up internal checkpoints within 100 miles of the international borders where they have the ability to stop people, question them and ask them to prove their citizenship. Now, Staples and other politicians are calling for more militarization which will inevitably deteriorate further U.S. citizens constitutional rights.

Texas_Plate_28

I don’t want to understate the growing security crisis in Mexico. It does have an impact on the United States. But a military-only solution doesn’t address the underlying factors that are fueling organized crime’s takeover of Mexico – namely poverty, impunity, government corruption and the U.S’. multi-billion dollar drug market.

It’s a purely cynical and political move to only push for militarization and not address the myriad social, economic and political issues fueling the crisis in Mexico. For Republican candidates such as Staples issues such as combating poverty, immigration reform or revising our outmoded drug laws are not politically expedient. They just don’t draw GOP Primary voters to the election booths like armored cars or boots on the ground, which is a shame for both the United States and Mexico.

by Melissa del Bosque

Published on: Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Melissa del Bosque has a Masters in Journalism from U.T. Austin and a M.P.H. from the Texas A&M School of Rural Public Health.  She spent five years in the Texas Senate as a communications director. Her work has been published in Time magazine and the NACLA Report on the Americas.

Follow @MelissaLaLinea on Twitter.

Hysteria, of course, has become a feature of the American diet.

Sunday, January 30th, 2011

About 11.8 million people live in the US-Mexico border area. Approximately one-quarter of the population in the US counties bordering Mexico live at or below the poverty line. This is over double the rate of the national average (12 percent) of the US population living in poverty. Furthermore, the unemployment rate in US counties on the southern border is 5.6 percent compared to 4.7 percent in the rest of the country. Mexican border states have an average poverty rate of 28 percent, significantly below the Mexican national average of 37 percent. (Sources: Environmental Protection Agency; Pan-American Health Organization/World Health Organization; Inter-American Development Bank; CIA World Factbook)

The border area in the United States consists of 48 counties in four states. Approximately 300,000 people live in 1,300 colonias in Texas and New Mexico. Colonias are unincorporated, semirural communities characterized by substandard housing and unsafe public drinking water or wastewater systems. Communities on the Mexican side of the border generally have less access to basic water and sanitation services than border communities in the United States. (Sources: Environmental Protection Agency; Pan-American Health Organization/World Health Organization)

Two of the 10 fastest-growing metropolitan areas in the United States, Laredo and McAllen, are located on the Texas-Mexico border. Estimates indicate the population of many border cities will double in 30 years. The population along the Texas border region is increasing at twice the rate of Texas as a whole. (Source: US Census Bureau)

UN to Mexico: Investigate abuse, kidnap of migrants

Monday, January 24th, 2011

GENEVA – The U.N.’s top human-rights official urged Mexico on Friday to investigate possible abuses and complicity by officials in kidnappings and extortion involving 40 Central American migrants.

Mexico is the transit route for thousands of illegal migrants seeking to reach the United States, with many falling victim to gangs and organized crime.

U.N. rights chief Navi Pillay said 40 migrants, mostly from El Salvador and Guatemala, were “abducted in highly questionable circumstances” on Dec. 16 from a freight train in the southern Mexican state of Oaxaca. Her office said Friday that the northbound freight train was stopped first “in a joint operation by police and migration officials” who detained 92 of the 250 migrants aboard.

“According to some accounts, military personnel were also involved,” Pillay’s office said, citing U.N. interviews with human-rights groups. “A somewhat confused picture has emerged about what happened next.”

According to the U.N., about 150 migrants got back on the train, run by a government-owned company. The driver then demanded money from the migrants but was not satisfied and told them there would be “more problems ahead.”

A half-hour later, the train was reportedly boarded by gunmen who assaulted and robbed some of the migrants and abducted 40 of them, including at least 10 women and one child.

Two days later, some escaped and managed to reach a migrant shelter in Oaxaca run by Alejandro Solalinde, a well-known Roman Catholic priest and migrant-rights activist who first reported the abductions.

“The Mexican authorities need to ascertain whether or not any state officials, including those working for the state-owned train operator, were complicit with the criminal organization that carried out the abductions and extortion, both in this and other cases,” Pillay said.

Copyright 2011 Arizona Daily Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Bill would stop Mexican Consulate officials entering Texas schools, colleges

Sunday, January 23rd, 2011

AUSTIN, Jan. 20 – A bill filed at the state Capitol seeks to prevent foreign consular officials from entering public schools or state universities in order to distribute foreign identification cards or accept applications for such cards.

If HB 428, authored by state Rep. Allen Fletcher, is passed into law, Mexican Consulate staff would not be allowed to go onto to a school or college campus to help students with their matricula consular applications.

Maurice in Otay Mnt_JB

In an exclusive interview with the Guardian, Fletcher, who served in the Houston Police Department for 21 years, explained the rationale behind his bill.

“The bottom line is we’re trying to keep foreign consuls from being on our campuses,” said Fletcher, R-Houston. “I don’t like them using our public facilities and our schools to basically access the foreign nationals that are in our country and give them an opportunity to take advantage of our benefits when they’re here illegally.”

The Matrícula Consular de Alta Seguridad (MCAS) (Consular Identification Card) is an identification card issued by the Government of Mexico through its consulate offices to Mexican nationals residing outside of Mexico regardless of their immigration status. -

It’s ridiculous but not terribly surprising in the current political environment. There are 40+ similar legislative proposals currently proposed in the Texas legislature according to Denise Gilman of Clinical Professor of Law – Immigration Clinic – University of Texas School of Law

© Copyright of the Rio Grande Guardian, www.riograndeguardian.com. Publisher: Steve Taylor. All rights reserved. – By Jesse Bertron

La Linea H.R. 6061

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Border Marker PoliminasFrom Albuquerque to Pancho Villa – New Mexico

It was getting late when we arrived on Highway 180 to the border of El Paso, Texas and Ciudad Juarez. The border Patrol office is closed, so we headed to Sunland Park near a the town of Rancho Anapara, Mexico. Currently, a metal mesh fence separates the community from Sunland Park, New Mexico, while trains carrying goods cut in front of residents’ homes, disrupting the day.

On the mesa above the community, the bigger, newer wall creeps down from the desert and under the gaze of the Christ statue on nearby Mount Cristo Rey. We phoned the Border Patrol office just for formality, and informed them that we will be taking photographs along the fence. We were told that new fence is just finished and it is build on the German Normandy architecture all the way from Santa Teresa to Pancho Villa. After taking few photographs of the triple fence at Sunland, we headed to Pancho Villa for camping. It was hot at the Camping ground 90F no wind and the water from the faucet was close to 110F.

Woke up early 6:30 am the sun was already hot and dry. We had breakfast at the only restaurant in town the “Pancho Villa Cafe” . The story goes that in early morning darkness of March 9, 1916, guerrillas of the Mexican Revolution under General Francisco “Pancho” Villa attacked the small New Mexico border town and military camp at Columbus the site of what is now Pancho Villa State Park my bed room for one night.

Eggs over easy, Huevos Rancheros and black coffee, before heading back to Santa Teresa, which is a young community at the junction of New Mexico Highways 278 and 9. It is about four miles north of the Mexico border. The sun was already grilling everything from jack rabbits to human, the films were melting literally.

Santa Teresa - New MexicoDouglas to Nogales – Arizona

The five-meter (18-foot) tall fence has a mesh woven so tightly that feet and fingers cannot grab hold, but it still allows people to see through. Steel pylons are set close enough to stop a truck from bursting through, and two meters of reinforced concrete underground deters any tunneling. The structure is designed to push would-be illegal immigrants and drug smugglers out into the desert where they are more easily caught, said the Border Patrol Agent.

11 am the sun was unbearable and headed straight to Douglas – Arizona via highway 9 and 80. We stopped at the Geronimo Surrender Memorial on Highway 80 just north of Apache, Arizona. The turnoff to the actual surrender site in Skeleton Canyon is just a few hundred yards south of there. We stopped at the Geronimo Surrender Memorial on Highway 80 just north of Apache, Arizona. The turnoff to the actual surrender site in Skeleton Canyon is just a few hundred yards south of there.

Douglas was founded as a smelter town, to treat the coppern ores of nearby Bisbee, Arizona. The town is named after mining pioneer James Douglas. Mayor Ray Borane says a fence will divide a community that has strong family ties across the border. Much of this dusty city along the border is separated from Mexico by a fence consisting of 12-foot vertical metal bars, spaced inches apart to prevent illegal immigrant from crossing.

Surveillance cameras are mounted on towers nearby, and Border Patrol agents posted hundreds of feet away in the desert scrub and flowering ocotillo watch for anyone who might try to scale, cut through, slip under or sneak around the fence. Though these fences are criticized for shifting would-be border-crossers to more dangerous and remote spots, the objectives is to make it harder for illegal immigrants to reach urban areas where they can slip into a car and head away from the border to find work.

The 5-mile-long border fence dividing Douglas, Arizona, and “Agua Prieta”, Mexico, is made of sheet metal and steel bars. Floodlights and surveillance cameras line the U.S. Side. Our visit here and to Douglas filled us with haunting images of a American ghetto splitting the town in half, separating families from their loved ones, workers from their jobs and farmers from their fields. I decide to skip Naco and the Minuteman Project border vigil, which has nearly shut down a 20-mile corridor of the U.S.-Mexico border to supposedly illegal Mexicans, has spawned the creation of similar civilian patrols from California to Texas. I went to Naco in 2007 , to witness for myself what was going on with the Minuteman Project (MMP), returned in 2008 to see the Minutemen building a 0.9-mile-long security fence on Richard Hodges’ ranch east of Naco.

Long Fence_Blog

Ms. Shawna Forde -inutemen American Defense (M.A.D)

The iron and steel fence is the latest project from the Minutemen anti-immigration activists that has placed itself at the sharp end of the immigration debate since launching a highly publicized series of border watches in 2005. Now, frustrated at what the group sees as the inaction of government, it has taken matters a step further, building its own border fence at a cost of around $1m at one of the busiest points on the line, in Naco 90 miles from Tucson.

“Until the Minutemen came along and really raised national awareness about this there was nothing like this,” says Shawna Forde Washington state , director of (M.A.D) “Minutemen American Defense”, “This was all holes in the fence, cattle were coming through, illegal aliens were coming through. It’s been a real problem for the ranchers out here. Ms. Shawna Forde has now been arrested and charged for the May 30th, 2009 violent home invasion and murder of an alleged drug runner, a 29 year old father, and his 9 year old daughter and the attempted murder of his wife in Arivaca, Arizona. Ms.Forde is accused of being the “ring leader” in this conspiracy to take drugs and money from the residence and then murder all occupants in the home.

Ms. Forde started (M.A.D) “Minutemen American Defense” several years back when she was kicked out of a Washington based minuteman organization for fraudulent use of funds which she denied. We spent two days with her last year and wondered if Ms. Forde is a criminally-minded individual who happened to latch onto the illegal alien minuteman border-watch movement. She believed organized criminals operating at the border between the U.S. and Mexico posed one of the greatest threats to the nation’s security, drug traffickers and human smugglers.

Pima County, Ariz., detectives on Friday described Forde leading a plot to finance her Minutemen activities by robbing suspected drug traffickers. She and two others are charged with a fatal shooting of Raul Flores, 29, and his daughter, Brisenia, 9 May 30 home invasion at a suspected drug trafficker’s home in Arivaca, Arizona.

She insisted to me that after they cross the border Mexicans are taking over area’s of our cities, neighborhoods, schools with their way of life which is: corruption, lies, drug dealing, welfare fraud, stealing, no respect for Americans and disrespect for American values and society. This is truly a sad situation, the wall serves purposes that go way beyond any security needs. The wall consolidates individual’s illegal ideologies through hate and killing. The wall severs the ties of thousands of Mexicans from their homes, schools, families, towns, farms, and water.

Yuma-blog

Glenn Spencer  - American Border Patrol (ABP)

Palominas, Arizona is an historic site because right across the border, during theMexican Revolution, Pancho Villa and a force of 1000 men raided a small town east of the boot heel of New Mexico called Columbus. They killed 18 people and burned the town before they rode out. It was the only foreign military invasion on U.S. soil in modern times. (It is also the site where Coronado first crossed into present day US in 1540).

After photographing the fence, the border patrol told us about the new fence build at border monument 98 on the American Border Patrol’s ranch in Sierra Vista. The construction of the seven-mile border fence began on September 5, 2008 and was completed by Thanksgiving. Had mixed feeling since I visited the area with Shawna Forde last year. Anyway, the decision was made to see if we could located the fence. As we tried to find our way, two men in a van from the American border patrol intercepted our car. We stopped and asked for permission to access the private road to the fence , I need to speak to the boss… follow me!!

The boss is none other but Glenn Spencer -an activist who advocates greater vigilance in securing the United States-Mexico border against illegal immigration. Spencer is the founder of the American Border Patrol group based in Sierra Vista, Arizona. American Border Patrol is a private, non-governmental, organization with the stated purpose of informing Americans about the border. It is known for using small, radio-controlled aircraft and ground sensing equipment to track illegal immigrants, and then relaying that information to the US Border Patrol. For more than a decade, the group has warned of a plan by Mexicans to “invade” and “conquer” the Southwestern U.S. Spencer claims that the Mexican government is “sponsoring the invasion of the United States with hostile intent.”

In 2004, Spencer acquired a new headquarters for his group, based on 18 acres of land near Palominas, which was leased to him by a supporter. From this base, Spencer runs his Web site, occasionally flies tiny unmanned airplanes along the border, and plans to install sensors along it as well.

Palonimas Wall -blog

Separation wall

Will we ever really understand. What the “separation wall” means to the American and Mexican people. How will it add to poverty and the separation of people, communities, culture and resources both natural and commercial? The price currently is $1.2 billion dollars with lifetime maintenance costs estimated close to $50 billion.

The expenditure of building and maintaining the wall will prove exorbitant. “La Linea – H.R 6061″ (Secure Fence Act 2006) photographic book project protest the “injustice” of the increasing isolation of American and Mexican people in their towns and cities, and to bring consciousness to dismantle the “Iron wall”!

All photographs are courtesy fo Cyndy McCrossen Production.