Posts Tagged ‘Nogales’

Border crossers finding new fence painful

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

NOGALES, AZ – The higher the wall, the harder they will fall. That’s what border crossers trying to scale the new border fence at Nogales are painfully finding out.

The imposing new border fence running through Nogales is proving to be a treacherous obstacle for suspected illegal immigrants.

Nogales 2011_v2

(New Wall 20 feet 6 inches 2011 – Old Wall 15 feet 2010)

A Nogales Police Department report says on Aug. 12, a woman broke her leg after climbing the border fence.

Two days later, officers found a second injured fence climber. And a third, suspected illegal immigrant from China fell and broke his leg on Aug 22.

Nogales Fire Department Chief Hector Robles tells the Nogales International that in addition to the height of the fence, adrenaline and miscalculations in determining the distance and angle of a fall ar potential injury factors.

By: Associated Press

photography – Maurice Sherif

Military engineers dig in to support Border Patrol

Tuesday, January 24th, 2012

On Jan. 6, members of an Alaska-based Army airborne engineer brigade parachuted out of an Air Force plane at Fort Huachuca. Since then, they’ve been working to cut 0.7 miles of border access road through rugged terrain approximately 3 miles west of the Mariposa Port of Entry in Nogales.

Project organizers say the experience, from the parachute drop-in to the remote road-building and eventual departure on Feb. 27, mirrors the type of mission the 40 soldiers might conduct if they were deployed to a place like Afghanistan.4f1ecea5436c7.image

“This will prepare them for future deployments, especially in the areas of current contingency operations,” said Armando Carrasco, spokesman for the Department of Defense’s Joint Task Force North (JTF North), the agency that coordinated the mission.

Standing on a hilltop above the work site Friday as heavy machinery dug through a steep slope below her, mission commander Lt. Michelle Zak spoke of the difficulties of maneuvering large earth movers around the mountains, canyons and ravines of western Santa Cruz County.

“It’s been challenging, but also a great opportunity for us to train,” she said.

This effort, along with other military road-building projects that have been conducted in the county in recent years, also provides a great opportunity for agents at the U.S. Border Patrol’s Nogales Station to gain better access to some of their hardest-to-control areas.

“You’ve got to look at it as a win-win situation,” said Agent Steven Passement, a spokesman for the Border Patrol’s Tucson Sector.

“One, for the unit that’s here and the units that will come, it’s real-world training experience,” he said. “And for us, we’re getting infrastructure put in place that’s going to be permanent.”

Those permanent roads, built with drainage culverts to keep them from washing out, helps agents responds faster to illegal activity in the area and provide aid more quickly to migrants in distress. What’s more, Passement said, a better road surface means less wear-and-tear on Border Patrol vehicles, and therefore less expenditures on new tires, shock absorbers and struts.

Local residents and businesses are also benefiting from the arrangement. The current group of 40 engineers is staying at a local hotel and spending some of their pocket money at local establishments.

“I know a lot of the soldiers have been out on the town, and they’ve enjoyed the tacos that come from the trucks,” Zak said.

Rancher Dan Bell, who grazes cattle in the same section of Coronado National Forest lands where the road are being built, says he’s seen an improvement in security in the area since the road-building began.

“Prior to these roads going in, there really wasn’t any way to get to the border in a lot of these areas,” Bell said. “It’s allowed (Border Patrol) to actually get down to the border and patrol the actual border rather than a larger area that they’d have to hike or go into on horseback.”

The soldiers themselves are not engaged in any law enforcement activity while on the road-building projects, Carrasco said. That duty is left up to the Border Patrol.

Environmental concerns

Since the construction is taking place on National Forest land, the U.S. Forest Service has been included in the project planning, and an environmental monitor is on hand to make sure the project stays within the construction easement, said Maj. Chris Neels, mission planner for JTF North.

Even so, environmentalists like Jenny Neeley, conservation policy director at the Tucson-based Sky Island Alliance, say they are worried about the long-term effects of border-infrastructure projects that are conducted outside of federal environmental law. Since April 2008, the Department of Homeland Security has operated under a waiver that allows it to build border fencing and related infrastructure in the U.S. Southwest without having to adhere to more than 30 environmental regulations.

“We’re extremely disappointed that none of it is subject to review under the National Environmental Policy Act because of the existing waiver along the border,” Neeley said. “Those roads are being installed without any oversight whatsoever, in terms of regulatory oversight or having to follow best practices.”

Neeley said she hadn’t seen the particular roads being built west of Nogales, but she said there have been numerous projects carried out under the waiver that have later led to erosion and flooding. She cited an example from the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, where rainwater runoff collapsed a 40-foot stretch of new border fence in August 2010 due to faulty design.

A Department of Homeland Security-sponsored public forum in December 2010 laid out the technical details and environmental analysis that had gone into the planning of the agency’s border road and fence projects in and around Nogales. Still, Greg Gephart, program manager for tactical infrastructure for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acknowledged that the projects would be conducted under the environmental waiver.4f1ecef54d05a.image_II

“The waiver doesn’t mean we’re throwing out all environmental considerations,” Gephart said at the time. “It’s just a method that allows us to expedite the construction.”

‘Good feeling’

The 40 Army engineers currently deployed to Nogales work six days a week, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Even so, due to the terrain, theirs is the first of three phases necessary to complete the 0.7 miles of roadway.

What’s more, military units are scheduled to execute four additional engineering missions in the Nogales area in support of the Border Patrol during the current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30.

It’s all organized by JTF North, based at Fort Bliss, Texas, which has been supporting federal law enforcement agencies along the Southwest border since 1989. Working as a liaison between law enforcement and all four branches of the military, JTF North has coordinated engineering missions that built and improved roads and installed border lighting, fencing and vehicle barriers in areas stretching from California to Texas.

The majority of the costs of the projects are paid for with Department of Defense counter-drug funds, JTF North says; the participating law enforcement agency covers only the cost of materials.

For example, Tucson-based Hertz Equipment Rental has been contracted to provide the heavy machinery for the current road effort, as well as training and maintenance. That’s all covered by JTF North, Carrasco said.

As for the price tag for the 0.7-mile road project, Carrasco estimated $400,000 for Phases 1 and 2 and $350,000 for Phase 3 – a grand total of $1.15 million.

Part of the expense includes the cost of housing the soldiers at an area hotel, which is also contracted to provide the team with a hot breakfast and dinner each day. (JTF North declined to name the hotel, citing security concerns.)

“It also creates a good quality of life for them while they’re deployed on this mission,” he said. “Obviously they work very hard, so it’s important that we also take care of them during their down time.”

As for the military engineers, they say they are greatly appreciative of the good meals and soft beds – as well as the warm, sunny weather of Southern Arizona. After all, they left their home base in the middle of the frigid, snowy and daylight-deprived Alaska winter.

Specialist Nickalous Herd, a native of Atlanta, praised the “wonderful weather, wonderful people and wonderful state” as he stood at the worksite Friday under clear blue skies and 70-degree temperatures. And while the local terrain has been a challenge to work with, Herd said, he has also enjoyed its rugged beauty.

“It is beautiful, it is extremely beautiful here,” he said.

Sgt. Everell Gustave, a native of the Boston area, said the experience of coming to a new area and working under new conditions with new equipment has been an important skill-builder for his team, which, if deployed to Afghanistan, might parachute into a remote area to rebuild roads, supply routes and airstrips.

“It is definitely a good feeling for our guys. We are getting the training that we need to be successful anywhere around the world,” Gustave said. “Helping out the Border Patrol is just a plus.”

By Jonathan Clark Nogales International

copyright © Nogales International

Images By Jonathan Clark

Nogales International
Phone number: (520) 375-5760
Address: 268 W. View Point Dr.
Nogales, AZ 85621

Pretty Ugly – Critique of “The American Wall Project” -by Jim Lewis

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

Maurice Sherif’s photos of the border wall are undoubtedly beautiful. And that’s precisely the problem.

The first notable thing about the border wall between the United States and Mexico is that the damned thing exists. Unless you live in the most southwestern reaches of America, you may have assumed, as I did, that the whole thing was merely a proposal, one of those preposterous ideas that are floated in Washington by politicians hotdogging for their constituents, only to be shot down by saner minds. But no, there is a wall, or rather, there are several walls, intermittently covering more than 600 miles of the 1,954-mile-long boundary between the U.S. and Mexico, including most of California’s and Arizona’s borders and much of New Mexico’s. (South Texas residents, a formidably independent bunch, have slowed its progress across our state, though some cities, like Brownsville, have been unable to stop the wall from slicing through their community.)

Otay Mountain Negative. California 2010

Almost all of it has been built by the Department of Homeland Security in the past four years, under the aegis of the Real ID Act, which granted the Secretary of the DHS an absolute, monarchical freedom to barricade our borders in whatever manner he chose, unhampered by the established laws of the land, including those covering environmental protection, clean air and water, and historical preservation. Starting at the Pacific Ocean, then—or, more accurately, about 450 yards into the ocean, presumably to deter swimmers, but not really strong swimmers—the wall runs over hill and dale, gouging a path through wildlife preservations, Indian reservations, and many poor neighborhoods (though at least one golf club managed to secure a waiver). In some places it’s little more than reinforced hurricane fencing with barbed wire on top, but in most others it’s an imposing structure built of slabs of concrete or steel that extend as high as 25 feet. It has cost over $2 billion to build thus far, and it’s expected to top out at more than $6 billion, not counting future costs for upkeep. An expensive project, and what’s more, ugly, unnecessary, and ineffective. And so we have The American Wall(MS Zephyr Publishing, distributed by the University of Texas Press), a forthright attack on the entire project, composed of two volumes, the first presenting nearly one hundred photographs by the French photographer Maurice Sherif, the second containing seven essays about the wall. The whole thing comes in a slipcase and retails for $150.

If you’re like me, you’ll read the essays first, and while you probably won’t find yourself any more cheerful when you’re done, you’ll almost certainly be better informed. They’re prefaced by a monody from the essayist Charles Bowden, a longtime observer of life and death along the border, and a brief statement from Sherif. Then comes a series of dismaying facts, presented without embellishment.

Anthropologists Miguel Díaz-Barriga and Margaret E. Dorsey focus on South Texas, where the wall is seen as an eyesore, an encroachment, and a crude obstacle to communities that have traditionally enjoyed fluid relations with their Mexican neighbors. What’s more, they point out, most of it has been built in urban areas and small towns, forcing illegal immigrants to cross the border in harsh and isolated regions, thereby increasing the number who die along the way. University of Texas law professor Denise Gilman neatly sums up the many ways in which the wall violates American legal precedents and international human rights law. Scott Nicol, an activist with No Border Wall and the Sierra Club, details how it threatens animal species whose existence depends on their ability to roam the lands around the Rio Grande. The last essay is an unfortunately homiletic performance by a doctor named James Tryon, but it’s followed by an exceptionally useful timeline, put together by the researcher Martha Davidson. There you will learn, for example, that barricading the border is utterly irrelevant to about half of all illegal immigrants, who come to the U.S. on legitimate visas and simply stay when they run out, and it’s little more than a speed bump for many of the rest (in four years, the wall has been breached well over three thousand times).

Border Wall California 2010

Volume one, which is the impetus for the entire publication, is more of a mixed bag. To be sure, Sherif’s photographs are beautiful, and they’ve been printed in quadratone black and white, an elaborate process that produces an unusually rich tonal range. Together with the translucent negative borders that frame them, this gives the pictures a plush, dreamy quality. Taken as a whole, it’s obviously a deluxe production. And just as obviously, it’s all wrong.

Almost everything about the pictures suggests a will to elegance that’s inappropriate to the matter at hand. Back in the day, black and white film was the standard for both newspapers and art photography. But that changed in the seventies and eighties, and now it looks deliberately archaic and somewhat effete—the photographic equivalent of wearing spats, or using the word “shall.” By the same token, the distorted strips at the edges of Sherif’s photographs indicate that he shot on large-format film, using a discontinued stock called Polaroid Type 55—an expensive and unwieldy process, useful mainly for large reproductions but somewhat pretentious otherwise. Moreover, by printing beyond the boundary of the negative, Sherif proves that he didn’t crop the photos, in accordance with an outmoded notion of authenticity that insists that “real” photographers frame their pictures through the camera rather than in the darkroom. It’s all very precious, “artistic” in the worst way.

As a result, Sherif’s pictures make the wall seem quite lovely as it wends abstractly across the landscape. In his opening statement he asks how “the United States became such an egregious violator of basic human rights.” Yet not one of his images shows a human being; the lives that the wall has degraded have been shut out of the pictures as well. What’s left looks like an art project—something by Christo, say, or a Richard Serra sculpture blown up to enormous scale. But the wall is not a work of art. It’s a crude and wasteful boondoggle. It should have been shot to reflect as much.

To be fair, Sherif has merely fallen victim to one of the commoner paradoxes of the medium: It’s very difficult to take a good picture of an ugly thing—to preserve its ugliness in a photograph that is estimable and compelling. The camera tends to glamorize whatever it sees, making the silkiest images out of those things we should find most revolting. Many photographers have exploited this phenomenon—Sebastião Salgado comes to mind, with his epic and hyper-refined treatment of miserable conditions around the world—and many have been admired for it. But I find it meretricious at best and vile at worst, and in this case it yields an especially cruel irony. As a photo book, The American Wall is very much like the American wall: too big, too expensive, and oblivious to the needs of the people it’s meant to serve.

Read an Excerpt: The American Wall: From the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico Copyright (c) 2011. Courtesy of the University of Texas Press. Buy it from University of Texas Press.

Glenn Spencer – American Patrol Report – AL JAZEERA

Wednesday, January 26th, 2011

Glenn Spencer is an activist who advocates greater vigilance in securing the United States–Mexico border against illegal immigration. Spencer is the founder of the American Border Patrol group based in Sierra Vista, Arizona. American Border Patrol is a private, non-governmental, organization with the stated purpose of informing Americans about the border. It is known for using small, radio-controlled aircraft and ground sensing equipment to track illegal immigrants, and then relaying that information to the US Border Patrol. Spencer also has assisted with the Minuteman Project and prior to 2004, worked closely with borderlands property owner and anti-illegal immigration activist Roger Barnett.

American Border Patrol

In August 2002, Glenn Spencer left his wife and children and moved to Arizona and formed the American Border Patrol. The organization uses cameras, sensors, “hawkeye” spotters, and unmanned aerial vehicles to identify suspected border crossings (The organization has outfitted three model airplanes with cameras which are designed to home in on ground sensors triggered by people walking in the desert). Once identified, the suspected illegal immigrants are videotaped whenever possible and reported to the United States Border Patrol. Video of their aerial patrols of the border are also available on the organization’s website. According to Spencer, American Border Patrol differs from other civilian patrol groups operating in Arizona in that their volunteers do not carry firearms and do not attempt to detain migrants, but rather focus on documenting border intrusions. . – Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress, Civilian Patrols Along the Border: Legal and Policy Issues, April 7, 2006.

La Linea H.R. 6061

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Border Marker PoliminasFrom Albuquerque to Pancho Villa – New Mexico

It was getting late when we arrived on Highway 180 to the border of El Paso, Texas and Ciudad Juarez. The border Patrol office is closed, so we headed to Sunland Park near a the town of Rancho Anapara, Mexico. Currently, a metal mesh fence separates the community from Sunland Park, New Mexico, while trains carrying goods cut in front of residents’ homes, disrupting the day.

On the mesa above the community, the bigger, newer wall creeps down from the desert and under the gaze of the Christ statue on nearby Mount Cristo Rey. We phoned the Border Patrol office just for formality, and informed them that we will be taking photographs along the fence. We were told that new fence is just finished and it is build on the German Normandy architecture all the way from Santa Teresa to Pancho Villa. After taking few photographs of the triple fence at Sunland, we headed to Pancho Villa for camping. It was hot at the Camping ground 90F no wind and the water from the faucet was close to 110F.

Woke up early 6:30 am the sun was already hot and dry. We had breakfast at the only restaurant in town the “Pancho Villa Cafe” . The story goes that in early morning darkness of March 9, 1916, guerrillas of the Mexican Revolution under General Francisco “Pancho” Villa attacked the small New Mexico border town and military camp at Columbus the site of what is now Pancho Villa State Park my bed room for one night.

Eggs over easy, Huevos Rancheros and black coffee, before heading back to Santa Teresa, which is a young community at the junction of New Mexico Highways 278 and 9. It is about four miles north of the Mexico border. The sun was already grilling everything from jack rabbits to human, the films were melting literally.

Santa Teresa - New MexicoDouglas to Nogales – Arizona

The five-meter (18-foot) tall fence has a mesh woven so tightly that feet and fingers cannot grab hold, but it still allows people to see through. Steel pylons are set close enough to stop a truck from bursting through, and two meters of reinforced concrete underground deters any tunneling. The structure is designed to push would-be illegal immigrants and drug smugglers out into the desert where they are more easily caught, said the Border Patrol Agent.

11 am the sun was unbearable and headed straight to Douglas – Arizona via highway 9 and 80. We stopped at the Geronimo Surrender Memorial on Highway 80 just north of Apache, Arizona. The turnoff to the actual surrender site in Skeleton Canyon is just a few hundred yards south of there. We stopped at the Geronimo Surrender Memorial on Highway 80 just north of Apache, Arizona. The turnoff to the actual surrender site in Skeleton Canyon is just a few hundred yards south of there.

Douglas was founded as a smelter town, to treat the coppern ores of nearby Bisbee, Arizona. The town is named after mining pioneer James Douglas. Mayor Ray Borane says a fence will divide a community that has strong family ties across the border. Much of this dusty city along the border is separated from Mexico by a fence consisting of 12-foot vertical metal bars, spaced inches apart to prevent illegal immigrant from crossing.

Surveillance cameras are mounted on towers nearby, and Border Patrol agents posted hundreds of feet away in the desert scrub and flowering ocotillo watch for anyone who might try to scale, cut through, slip under or sneak around the fence. Though these fences are criticized for shifting would-be border-crossers to more dangerous and remote spots, the objectives is to make it harder for illegal immigrants to reach urban areas where they can slip into a car and head away from the border to find work.

The 5-mile-long border fence dividing Douglas, Arizona, and “Agua Prieta”, Mexico, is made of sheet metal and steel bars. Floodlights and surveillance cameras line the U.S. Side. Our visit here and to Douglas filled us with haunting images of a American ghetto splitting the town in half, separating families from their loved ones, workers from their jobs and farmers from their fields. I decide to skip Naco and the Minuteman Project border vigil, which has nearly shut down a 20-mile corridor of the U.S.-Mexico border to supposedly illegal Mexicans, has spawned the creation of similar civilian patrols from California to Texas. I went to Naco in 2007 , to witness for myself what was going on with the Minuteman Project (MMP), returned in 2008 to see the Minutemen building a 0.9-mile-long security fence on Richard Hodges’ ranch east of Naco.

Long Fence_Blog

Ms. Shawna Forde -inutemen American Defense (M.A.D)

The iron and steel fence is the latest project from the Minutemen anti-immigration activists that has placed itself at the sharp end of the immigration debate since launching a highly publicized series of border watches in 2005. Now, frustrated at what the group sees as the inaction of government, it has taken matters a step further, building its own border fence at a cost of around $1m at one of the busiest points on the line, in Naco 90 miles from Tucson.

“Until the Minutemen came along and really raised national awareness about this there was nothing like this,” says Shawna Forde Washington state , director of (M.A.D) “Minutemen American Defense”, “This was all holes in the fence, cattle were coming through, illegal aliens were coming through. It’s been a real problem for the ranchers out here. Ms. Shawna Forde has now been arrested and charged for the May 30th, 2009 violent home invasion and murder of an alleged drug runner, a 29 year old father, and his 9 year old daughter and the attempted murder of his wife in Arivaca, Arizona. Ms.Forde is accused of being the “ring leader” in this conspiracy to take drugs and money from the residence and then murder all occupants in the home.

Ms. Forde started (M.A.D) “Minutemen American Defense” several years back when she was kicked out of a Washington based minuteman organization for fraudulent use of funds which she denied. We spent two days with her last year and wondered if Ms. Forde is a criminally-minded individual who happened to latch onto the illegal alien minuteman border-watch movement. She believed organized criminals operating at the border between the U.S. and Mexico posed one of the greatest threats to the nation’s security, drug traffickers and human smugglers.

Pima County, Ariz., detectives on Friday described Forde leading a plot to finance her Minutemen activities by robbing suspected drug traffickers. She and two others are charged with a fatal shooting of Raul Flores, 29, and his daughter, Brisenia, 9 May 30 home invasion at a suspected drug trafficker’s home in Arivaca, Arizona.

She insisted to me that after they cross the border Mexicans are taking over area’s of our cities, neighborhoods, schools with their way of life which is: corruption, lies, drug dealing, welfare fraud, stealing, no respect for Americans and disrespect for American values and society. This is truly a sad situation, the wall serves purposes that go way beyond any security needs. The wall consolidates individual’s illegal ideologies through hate and killing. The wall severs the ties of thousands of Mexicans from their homes, schools, families, towns, farms, and water.

Yuma-blog

Glenn Spencer  - American Border Patrol (ABP)

Palominas, Arizona is an historic site because right across the border, during theMexican Revolution, Pancho Villa and a force of 1000 men raided a small town east of the boot heel of New Mexico called Columbus. They killed 18 people and burned the town before they rode out. It was the only foreign military invasion on U.S. soil in modern times. (It is also the site where Coronado first crossed into present day US in 1540).

After photographing the fence, the border patrol told us about the new fence build at border monument 98 on the American Border Patrol’s ranch in Sierra Vista. The construction of the seven-mile border fence began on September 5, 2008 and was completed by Thanksgiving. Had mixed feeling since I visited the area with Shawna Forde last year. Anyway, the decision was made to see if we could located the fence. As we tried to find our way, two men in a van from the American border patrol intercepted our car. We stopped and asked for permission to access the private road to the fence , I need to speak to the boss… follow me!!

The boss is none other but Glenn Spencer -an activist who advocates greater vigilance in securing the United States-Mexico border against illegal immigration. Spencer is the founder of the American Border Patrol group based in Sierra Vista, Arizona. American Border Patrol is a private, non-governmental, organization with the stated purpose of informing Americans about the border. It is known for using small, radio-controlled aircraft and ground sensing equipment to track illegal immigrants, and then relaying that information to the US Border Patrol. For more than a decade, the group has warned of a plan by Mexicans to “invade” and “conquer” the Southwestern U.S. Spencer claims that the Mexican government is “sponsoring the invasion of the United States with hostile intent.”

In 2004, Spencer acquired a new headquarters for his group, based on 18 acres of land near Palominas, which was leased to him by a supporter. From this base, Spencer runs his Web site, occasionally flies tiny unmanned airplanes along the border, and plans to install sensors along it as well.

Palonimas Wall -blog

Separation wall

Will we ever really understand. What the “separation wall” means to the American and Mexican people. How will it add to poverty and the separation of people, communities, culture and resources both natural and commercial? The price currently is $1.2 billion dollars with lifetime maintenance costs estimated close to $50 billion.

The expenditure of building and maintaining the wall will prove exorbitant. “La Linea – H.R 6061″ (Secure Fence Act 2006) photographic book project protest the “injustice” of the increasing isolation of American and Mexican people in their towns and cities, and to bring consciousness to dismantle the “Iron wall”!

All photographs are courtesy fo Cyndy McCrossen Production.